File Compression & Encryption:
Website: WinRAR
We used the Intel X25-M SSD to provide a uniform performance base between all the boards tested in file compression and decompression.
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-DS4
-
Asus P6T Deluxe
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P
-
MSI Eclipse SLI
-
Foxconn Renaissance
-
Foxconn Blood Rage
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R
-
MSI X58 Pro
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Time in Seconds (lower is better)
-
MSI Eclipse SLI
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-DS4
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P
-
Asus P6T Deluxe
-
Foxconn Renaissance
-
Foxconn Blood Rage
-
MSI X58 Pro
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R
-
77.0
-
77.5
-
77.5
-
77.5
-
78.0
-
79.0
-
79.0
-
80.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Time in Seconds (lower is better)
Large file compression was average from the Renaissance, with the board scoring identically to both the Blood Rage and Gigabyte's 'budget' Core i7 board, the EX58-UD3R.
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P
-
MSI Eclipse SLI
-
Foxconn Renaissance
-
Asus P6T Deluxe
-
Foxconn Blood Rage
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-DS4
-
MSI X58 Pro
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R
0
3
5.5
8
10.5
13
15.5
18
Time in Seconds (lower is better)
-
Foxconn Blood Rage
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-DS4
-
MSI Eclipse SLI
-
Foxconn Renaissance
-
Asus P6T Deluxe
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P
-
MSI X58 Pro
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R
-
23.5
-
23.5
-
23.5
-
24.0
-
24.0
-
24.0
-
27.0
-
29.0
Time in Seconds (lower is better)
The Renaissance is pretty average in file decompression - evidently the SATA performance is within a second of the other boards we've tested, which won't be seen in the real world.
Want to comment? Please log in.